![]() It offers the possibility of selectively removing metadata to protect privacy and intellectual property, directly processing RAW images, as well as tinkering with many development tools: brightness and contrast adjustments for different tone bands, HDR processing, boosting saturation without affecting skin tones using the vibrance tool, applying post-crop vignette to any cropped image, or removing red eye without affecting picture quality. Compared to ACDSee, this edition is dedicated to professional and advanced amateur photographers looking for total control over their workflows. It's possible to examine photo details using zoom, navigator, magnifying glass and histogram tools, instantly adjust exposure and remove color cast, eliminate flaws and other unwanted image parts using heal and clone tools, as well as to add text, custom borders, vignettes, drop shadows, matte, and edge effects, among others.ĪCDSee Pro is available for $59.95 / €62.95 and adds several features to the ones previously described. The application supports visually tagging pictures via color labels, customizing and saving workspace layouts, metadata views, the file sort order and shortcut keys, as well as for loading external editors, viewing maps and enabling reverse geocoding by selecting a pin on the map.ĪCDSee features support for an extensive list of file types (image, audio, video). You can create as many ACDSee databases as you want and swiftly cycle through them. It lets you organize photographs using folders, categories, keywords, metadata, ratings and color labels, as well as quickly track down images by building indexes based on metadata, file properties, data, event, keyword, rating, location and edited state. The developer presents ACDSee (available for $39.95 / €41.95), the slimmest package out of the three, as ideal for photo enthusiasts with a growing image collection. Differences between ACDSee, ACDSee Pro and ACDSee Ultimate It's an all-around package that contains tools for managing, viewing, developing, editing and publishing photographs, mainly catering to professional users, such as graphic designers and creative artists. Only those duplicates which I worked with previously are actually opened.ACDSee Ultimate represents the most comprehensive version from the ACDSee graphic series: ACDSee, ACDSee Pro, and ACDSee Ultimate. Here is a sample portion of my list at the end of the process:Īnd here is what a portion of my list looks like after I clicked on the arrow button in the left upper corner of the listĪs can be seen, the upper section of this portion of the list looks no different from the "unopened list". Now you can Click the arrow buttons to open duplicate sets and review the filenames and locations That is actually NOT true. In the meantime I did find a real bug in the duplicate finder:Īccording to the Help Text after the Duplicate Finder has completed " All duplicate sets matching your specifications will be listed". In my example above, it would allow me to identify an identical image in a JPG version with one in a PNG version, or an image of a certain size with a duplicate version of that image in a smaller or larger size. That will allow the identification of "duplicates" as I understand duplicates. ![]() To me, there should be a "slider" to identify "how close two images are related to each other". But if I then run the "Find Duplicates" function, it will not consider these two images true duplicates. ![]() For example: If I grab a JPG image file and simply create a png version of that same image, I can easily do that. In case of an image file, that is not very useful. ![]() Reading between the lines I think ACDSee considers a duplicate file to be an IDENTICAL file. Help simply explains that one can "Use the Find Duplicates command to easily find and remove duplicate files." However, what ACDSee considers a duplicate file is unclear. Why, you ask? The help text talks about how to use the feature, but does not talk about what it does. I just did a couple of tests with the "Find Duplicates." feature, but found that it is unclear/false advertising.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |