GeditĪs mentioned in our methodology, the popularity of one editor over another is only based on questions asked. Likewise, if one’s own user programming is of great help, it might be of value to the community and should be shared. The data on editor choice we discovered bears this out. They want to feel the sense that they have adapted their editor to fit their needs rather than the other way around. A static program, even and integrated development environment (IDE) bloated with lots of intuitive features, may makes some aspects of development easier.īut some users don’t want it to be easy. Over many years of usage, a good text editor should enliven one’s development practices. What makes a good text editor? The needs of each user will vary, but I’d say a good baseline criteria should be: As of June 2020, the popularity of these editors, based on tags, were as follows: Analysis of Each Editor Any question tagged with a certain editor was counted. I looked at all the questions in the Ask Ubuntu forum and sorted based on tags. We found a mix of graphical user interface (GUI) and command line interface (CLI) editors. What features really matter? What level of customization is necessary? Such questions make the search more enjoyable.įor our analysis, we took a look at Ubuntu users to find out which editor was most popular. Why is this non-secret a secret? The secret is kept alive because the debate itself invigorates the power users of the world in their search for the perfect editor. ![]() The best-kept secret is, no text editor is “the best” because it all depends on how you like to work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |